Data is everywhere, even in places we least expect it—like your farm. From soil sensors and GPS-guided tractors to farm management apps, agriculture has stepped into the digital age, and with that, data is collected with every turn of the plough and every harvest hauled to market.
But who owns this AgData? And how should it be used? Let’s dive in.
The Rise of AgData
Agriculture has become data-driven. From planting to harvesting, every step is now monitored and optimised with precision tools. Farm management software, smart irrigation systems, and weather forecasting apps generate enormous amounts of data like yield maps, soil health records, and machine performance logs, to name a few.
For instance, John Deere equips its farming machine with sensors to collect data, which is then analysed to provide farmers with recommendations. Furthermore, the program gives users access to algorithms that showcase historical soil moisture trends and crop-level weather patterns as far as 30 years. It even allows farmers to input different seed types and predict intended yields before planting begins.
But the twist is that much of this data doesn’t sit neatly on your hard drive. It’s often stored on servers owned by tech companies or shared with equipment manufacturers, agribusinesses, and third-party platforms. This raises an uncomfortable truth: once your data leaves your hands, control over how it’s used or shared can become blurry.
Who Controls the Data? Farmers or Agriculture Technology Providers (ATPs)?
Farmers, who are at the heart of this digital shift, have raised valid concerns about how their data is collected, stored, and used. One of the most debated topics surrounding the implementation of Smart Information Systems (SIS) is the issue of data ownership. The question of “who owns the data and who can benefit financially from it” remains central. Concerns about whether farms should hand over control of their data to third parties have also been raised.
Download the Ebook nowÂ
But who are the ATPs? They are companies that develop or introduce advanced tools and platforms and play a critical role in modern farming. They provide technologies like drones for scouting fields or AI-driven analytics for precision farming. For instance, a farmer might hire an ATP to scan a 100-acre farm using a drone that captures RGB or multispectral images. Images obtained are then processed to generate insights, such as identifying areas that require more irrigation or pest control.
Another worry is that farmers’ data might be used to market unnecessary products back to them. For example, large agricultural companies might influence farmers to purchase specific seeds, sprays, and equipment, ultimately profiting from service costs and increased sales.
While many agricultural technology providers (ATPs) assert that farmers retain ownership of their data, they often incorporate royalty-free licenses that allow the ATPs to use the data regardless of who owns it. This creates a challenge if a farmer wishes to switch to another ATP. Breaching such contracts, particularly with companies that maintain strict legal controls over intellectual property and data analytics, can lead to penalties or even legal action.
Moreover, finding an alternative ATP may not be straightforward due to complications surrounding data ownership. Even when companies claim they anonymise data, there’s often no guarantee it can’t be pieced back together to reveal sensitive insights. Farmers face the risk of losing control over their most valuable resource without realising it.
Balanced Approach to AgData Ownership
The relationship between farmers and Agriculture Technology Providers (ATPs) must be rooted in trust and fairness to actualise a thriving agricultural ecosystem. Farmers rely on these advanced tools to improve efficiency and yields, while ATPs depend on farm-generated data to enhance their technologies and create valuable insights. But for this partnership to work, both sides must feel they are getting equal benefits.
Farmers should have control over how their data is used, and ATPs need to provide straightforward contracts that clearly outline terms of ownership, access, and sharing. At the same time, ATPs could adopt ways to share the value generated from the data, like offering revenue-sharing models or co-developing solutions with farmers.
Pathways to Ethical AgData Practices
Ethical AgData ownership demands a clear model such as clear policies, transparent systems, and a commitment to fairness for all stakeholders. Here’s how a more equitable framework can take shape:
1. Defining Data Ownership
Governments and industry bodies must establish policies that explicitly define data ownership. Just as intellectual property rights protect creators in other sectors, farm data should remain under the control of the farmers who generate it. Policies set boundaries that prevent misuse and also ensure farmers retain decision-making authority over their information.
2. Farmer-First Platforms
Agritech companies must champion farmer-centric solutions. Platforms that empower farmers to control, limit, or monetise access to their data are not just ethical, but necessary. Emerging startups should explore this space by offering tools that let farmers determine who accesses their data and for what purpose.
3. Transparent Agreements
Ethical data practices begin with clarity. Companies need to move away from convoluted legal terms and adopt simple, accessible contracts that farmers can easily understand. Transparency in how data is collected, stored, and shared creates a foundation of trust that cannot be achieved through vague or overly complex agreements.
4. Strengthening Farmer Cooperatives
Farmer cooperatives have the potential to shift the balance of power. They can demand fairer treatment from Agritech companies can be achieved by pooling resources and collectively negotiating data-sharing terms. Also, cooperatives could facilitate shared access to advanced tools which could ensure that smallholder farmers are not left behind in the digital revolution.
5. Educating and Advocating
Education programs, workshops, and industry forums will help them understand their rights, identify ethical practices, and ask critical questions when adopting new technologies. Advocacy efforts, both individual and collective, are essential to push for a more balanced and fair AgData ecosystem.
Closing Thoughts
The debate over AgData ethics is far from over. But it is clear that farmers must have a seat at the table. Without their voices, policies and practices will inevitably tilt in favour of those with more power and resources.
Data is a tool, but how it is wielded matters. Farmers deserve not just access to their data but also the right to decide how it is used, shared, or monetised. Their livelihoods and the future of agriculture depend on it.
